ABSTRACT
In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for the treatment of multiple submucosal tumors (SMT) in the upper gastrointestinal tract, data of 24 cases with upper gastrointestinal SMT (including 56 SMT lesions) treated at Taizhou Municipal Hospital and Shanghai East Hospital from January 2016 to June 2021 were collected for retrospective observation. The treatment effect, occurrence of major adverse events and follow-up results were analyzed. The results showed that 19 cases (79.2%) underwent tumor resection through one tunnel, and 5 cases (20.8%) underwent tumor resection through two tunnels. The length of the tunnel was 3-12 cm, with an average of 6.2 cm. The surgical time ranged from 19 to 130 minutes, with an average of 55.6 minutes. The overall resection rate was 89.29% (50/56). The hospitalization time was 2-7 days, with an average of 3.5 days. Major adverse events occurred in 2 cases (8.3%), all of which were mucosal injuries, and were cured with titanium clips and self expanding metal sealing stents. During a follow-up period of 6-64 months, with an average of 32.0 months, there was no residual tumor, tumor implantation tunnel, local recurrence, distant metastasis or death. To sum up, STER is safe and feasible for the treatment of multiple SMT in the upper gastrointestinal tract. The main resection method is single tunnel, and double tunnel is required for multiple SMT far apart.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the clinical features, characteristics under white-light endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography, and treatment strategies of gastritis cystica profunda (GCP) accompanied with or without neoplastic lesions.Methods:Clinical data of 35 patients, who were pathologically diagnosed as having GCP after endoscopic or surgical resection in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2015 to February 2021, were retrospectively collected, including 27 patients with neoplastic lesions. The demographic information, clinical manifestations, endoscopic features, treatment methods, and pathological results of GCP were summarized.Results:Thirty-five patients with GCP were 68.26±8.08 years old, and mostly male (80.00%, 28/35). The most common symptom was upper abdominal pain, accounting for 31.43% (11/35), and 25.71% (9/35) had no symptoms. Other symptoms included acid reflux, heartburn, abdominal distension, anemia, and choking sensation after eating. The most common site of GCP was cardia (51.43%, 18/35), and the main endoscopic manifestations of GCP were flat mucosal lesions (68.57%, 24/35), mainly 0-Ⅱa and 0-Ⅱa+Ⅱc type lesions, accounting for 66.67% (16/24). The second common endoscopic manifestation was polypoid eminence (20.00%, 7/35). Endoscopic ultrasonography was performed in 15 patients, with main manifestations of uniform hypoechoic with or without cystic echo (73.33%, 11/15). Among the GCP cases, 33 patients received endoscopic resection, and 2 received surgical treatment. The treatment processes were all successfully completed, and en-bloc resection was accomplished for all lesions receiving endoscopy, with the mean endoscopic operation time of 86.13 min. One patient suffered postoperative delayed bleeding after ESD which was stopped by endoscopic hemostasis. Final pathological results showed that the proportion of GCP complicated with neoplastic lesions was 77.14% (27/35), 68.57% (24/35) with early gastric cancer or precursor. Twenty-three cases achieved R0 resection. One case showed positive basal resection margin and vascular invasion, and recurrence happened in situ at the 5th month of follow-up, surgical resection was then performed. The endoscopic complete resection rate was 95.83% (23/24).Conclusion:GCP usually occurs in middle-aged and elderly male, often located in cardia, manifested mainly as flat mucosal lesions and polypoid changes. Endoscopic ultrasonography shows a high diagnostic value for GCP, and endoscopic treatment is safe and effective minimally invasive treatment for GCP.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the efficacy of domestic and imported hemostatic clips in preventing delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥ 10 mm.Methods:Clinical data of 789 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps (polyp diameter ≥10 mm) in Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to December 2019 were collected. The patients were divided into DPPB group ( n=15) and non-DPPB group ( n=774). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the influential factors for DPPB. The patients using one type of hemostatic clip were divided into the domestic hemostatic clip group ( n=499) and the imported hemostatic clip group ( n=208). The efficacy of hemostatic clips in preventing DPPB in the two groups was compared. Results:Among the 789 patients undergoing endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps, 1.9% (15/789) suffered from DPPB. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that pedunculated polyp was an independent risk factor for DPPB ( OR=6.621, 95% CI: 2.278-19.241, P=0.001), and closure of mucosal defect was an independent protective factor for DPPB ( OR=0.169,95% CI: 0.050-0.570, P=0.004). Regardless of physician experience, there was no significant difference between the domestic and imported hemostatic clip group in preventing DPPB after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps ≥10 mm [experienced physicians: 1.8% (7/385) VS 0.6% (1/175), χ2=1.314, P=0.445; common physicians: 2.6% (3/114) VS 3.0% (1/33), χ2=0.010, P>0.999]. The domestic hemostatic clip group paid for less medical expenses than the imported hemostatic clip group (experienced physicians: 1 433.51±889.02 yuan VS 3 033.97±1 686.87 yuan, t<0.001 , P<0.001; common physicians: 1 181.58±815.29 yuan VS 3 303.46±1 690.43 yuan, t<0.001 ,P<0.001). Conclusion:Pedunculated polyp is an independent risk factor for DPPB after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyp larger than 10 mm, and clipping can significantly reduce the risk for DPPB. There is no significant difference in the prevention of DPPB between domestic and imported clips, but domestic clips compared with imported clips yield less medical burden, which are suitable for promotion to primary hospitals and major clinical centers.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To compare the clinical efficacy of endoscopic resection and laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with a maximum diameter of 2 to 5 cm, and to analyze the influence of factors such as tumor surface, growth pattern and lesion origin on the choice of resection method, so as to provide a safer and more effective treatment for patients with gastric GIST.Methods:From January 2012 to November 2019, at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, the clinical data of 301 patients with gastric GIST who underwent endoscopic resection (137 cases in the endoscopic resection group) or laparoscopic surgery (164 cases in the laparoscopic surgery group) were retrospectively analyzed, including age, gender, whether there was depression on the tumor surface (the local subsidence depth of the mucosa on the tumor surface was >5 mm), whether the tumor surface was irregular (non-hemispherical or non-elliptical tumor surface), whether there was combined ulcer, location, shape, origin of the lesion, growth pattern (intralumina growth or combined intraluminal and extraluminal growth), risk classification (very low risk, low risk, medium risk, high risk), whether the tumor was en bloc resection, operation time, whether bleeding or not, fasting time, indwelling time of gastric tube, time of hospitalization, time of postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and follow-up. Independent sample t test, chi-square test or Fisher′s exact test and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical analysis. Results:Among the 137 patients with gastric GIST in the endoscopic resection group, 85 cases (62.0%) underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection, 9 cases (6.6%) underwent endoscopic submucosal excavation, 42 cases (30.7%) underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection, and 1 case (0.7%) underwent submucosal tunnel endoscopic resection. There were no significant differences in gender, age, lesion location, tumor size, and risk classification between the endoscopic resection group and the laparoscopic surgery group (all P>0.05). The tumor surface was depressed, with ulcer or irregular in 1, 49, 26, and 2 cases of patients with gastric GIST of very low risk, low risk, medium risk and high risk, respectively. There was statistically significant difference in the proportion of depression, irregularity and ulcer on the tumor surface at different risk levels ( Z=-2.55, P=0.011). The complete tumor resection rate of the endoscopic resection group was lower than that of the laparoscopic surgery group (86.1%, 118/137 vs. 100.0%, 164/164), and the difference was statistically significant ( χ2=24.28, P<0.001). However the operation time, fasting time, the indwelling time of gastric tube, time of hospitalization, and the time of postoperative hospital stay of the endoscopic resection group were shorter than those of the laparoscopic surgery group, and the total hospitalization cost was lower than that of the laparoscopic surgery group (90.0 min (62.5 min, 150.0 min) vs. 119.5 min, (80.0 min, 154.2 min); 3 d (3 d, 4 d) vs. 5 d (4 d, 7 d); 3 d (2 d, 4 d) vs. 4 d (2 d, 6 d); 11 d (10 d, 14 d) vs. 16 d (12 d, 20 d); 7 d (6 d, 9 d) vs. 9 d (7 d, 11 d); (38 211.6±10 221.0) yuan vs. (59 926.1±17 786.1) yuan), and the differences were statistically significant ( Z=-2.46, -7.12, -4.44, -6.89 and -5.92, t=-13.24; all P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative abdominal pain and other severe postoperative complications (including shock, respiratory failure, pulmonary embolism, gastroparesis, etc.) of the endoscopic resection group were all lower than those of the laparoscopic surgery group (16.8%, 23/137 vs. 27.4%, 45/164; 0.7%, 1/137 vs. 4.9%, 8/164), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=4.84, Fisher′s exact test, P=0.028 and 0.043). There were no significant differences in the incidence of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative bleeding, fever and perforation between the two groups (all P>0.05). The incidence of operation-related complications of lesions with intraluminal growth and originating from muscularis propria in the endoscopic resection group were lower than those of the laparoscopic surgery group (19.5%, 25/128 vs. 32.6%, 45/138; 12.6%, 12/95 vs. 31.4%, 37/118), and the differences were statistically significant ( χ2=5.86 and 10.42, P=0.016 and 0.001). There was no significant difference in the postoperative tumor recurrent rate between the endoscopic resection group and the laparoscopic surgery group (0, 0/137 vs. 2.4%, 4/164; Fisher’s exact test, P=0.129). Conclusions:Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective for gastric GIST with a maximum diameter of 2 to 5 cm, which is superior to laparoscopic surgery. However, laparoscopic surgery is recommended for tumor with depressed, ulcerative, or irregular surface and combined intraluminal and extraluminal growth.
ABSTRACT
@#Surgery is a classic traditional method for the treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer, and it is also recognized as an effective first-choice method in the medical community. With the development of endoscopic technology, esophagus-preserving comprehensive treatment of esophageal cancer has almost the same or even better effects in some aspects in the treatment of early esophageal cancer than surgery. Many clinical guidelines have also recommended it as the first-choice treatment for early esophageal cancer. The room for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer has been further compressed. This article discusses the comprehensive treatment model of esophageal cancer from the perspective of thoracic surgery, aiming to find a new position of thoracic surgery in the treatment of esophageal cancer.
ABSTRACT
Colonoscopy with endoscopic resection of detected colonic adenomas interrupts the adenoma-carcinoma sequence and reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer and cancer-related mortality. In the past decade, there have been significant developments in instruments and techniques for endoscopic polypectomy. Guidelines have been formulated by various professional bodies in Europe, Japan and the United States, but some of the recommendations differ between the various bodies. An expert professional workgroup under the auspices of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore, was set up to provide guidance on the endoscopic management of colonic polyps in Singapore. A total of 23 recommendations addressed the following issues: accurate description and diagnostic evaluation of detected polyps; techniques to reduce the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding and delayed perforation; the role of specific endoscopic resection techniques; the histopathological criteria for defining endoscopic cure; and the role of surveillance colonoscopy following curative resection.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adenoma/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Singapore , United StatesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: A common site of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is the rectum. The technique most often used is endoscopic mucosal resection with saline injection. However, deep margins are often difficult to obtain because submucosal invasion is common. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a technique in which the bowel lumen is filled with water rather than air, precluding the need for submucosal lifting. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of UEMR for removing small rectal neuroendocrine tumors (rNETs). METHODS: Retrospective study with patients who underwent UEMR in two centers. UEMR was performed using a standard colonoscope. No submucosal injection was performed. Board-certified pathologists conducted histopathologic assessment. RESULTS: UEMR for small rNET was performed on 11 patients (nine female) with a mean age of 55.8 years and 11 lesions (mean size 7 mm, range 3-12 mm). There were 9 (81%) patients with G1 rNET and two patients with G2, and all tumors invaded the submucosa with only one restricted to the mucosa. None case showed vascular or perineural invasion. All lesions were removed en bloc. Nine (81%) resections had free margins. Two patients had deep margin involvement; one had negative biopsies via endoscopic surveillance, and the other was lost to follow-up. No perforations or delayed bleeding occurred. CONCLUSION: UEMR appeared to be an effective and safe alternative for treatment of small rNETs without adverse events and with high en bloc and R0 resection rates. Further prospective studies are needed to compare available endoscopic interventions and to elucidate the most appropriate endoscopic technique for resection of rNETs.
RESUMO CONTEXTO: Um local comum de tumores neuroendócrinos (TNEs) é o reto. A técnica mais utilizada é a ressecção endoscópica da mucosa com injeção de solução salina. No entanto, as margens profundas costumam ser difíceis de ressecar porque a invasão da submucosa é comum. A ressecção endoscópica sob imersão d'água (RESI) é uma técnica em que o lúmen intestinal é preenchido com água em vez de ar, evitando a necessidade de elevação submucosa. OBJETIVO: Este estudo teve como objetivo avaliar a eficácia e segurança da RESI para a remoção de pequenos TNEs retais (rTNEs). MÉTODOS: Estudo retrospectivo com pacientes que realizaram RESI em dois centros. RESI foi realizada usando um colonoscópio padrão. Nenhuma injeção submucosa foi realizada. Patologistas certificados conduziram avaliação histopatológica. RESULTADOS: RESI foi realizada para pequenos rTNEs em 11 pacientes (nove mulheres) com média de idade de 55,8 anos e 11 lesões (tamanho médio de 7 mm, variando de 3-12 mm). Havia 9 (81%) pacientes com G1 rTNEs e dois pacientes com G2, sendo que todos os tumores invadiam a submucosa sendo apenas um restrito a mucosa. Nenhum caso mostrou invasão vascular ou perineural. Todas as lesões foram removidas em bloco. Nove (81%) ressecções tiveram margens livres. Dois pacientes tiveram envolvimento de margens profundas; um teve biópsias negativas por meio de vigilância endoscópica e o outro perdeu o acompanhamento. Não ocorreram perfurações ou sangramento tardios. CONCLUSÃO: A RESI parece ser uma alternativa eficaz e segura para o tratamento de pequenos rTNEs sem eventos adversos e com altas taxas de ressecção em bloco e R0. Mais estudos prospectivos são necessários para comparar as intervenções endoscópicas disponíveis e para elucidar a técnica endoscópica mais adequada para ressecção de rTNEs.
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Intestinal Mucosa/surgery , Middle AgedABSTRACT
Objective:To explore the endoscopic features of early gastric cancer (EGC) related to non-curative endoscopic resection, and to construct an assessment model to quantify the risk of non-curative resection.Methods:From August 2006 to October 2019, 378 lesions that underwent endoscopic resection and were diagnosed pathological as EGC in the Department of Gastroenterology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included in this case-control study.Seventy-eight (20.6%) non-curative resection lesions were included in the observation group, and 234 lesions which selected from 300 lesions of curative resection were included in the control group according to the difference of operation year ±1 with the observation group, and the ratio of 1∶3 of the observation group to the control group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to explore the risk factors for non-curative resection. The independent risk factor with the minimum β coefficient was assigned 1 point, and the remaining factors were scored according to the ratio of their β coefficient to the minimum. A predictive model was established to analyze the 378 lesions.The non-curative resection rates of lesions of different scores were calculated. Results:Univariate analysis showed that the lesion diameter, the location, redness, ulcer or ulcer scar, fold interruption, fold entanglement, and invasion depth observed with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) were associated with non-curative resection of EGC lesions ( P<0.05), and contact or spontaneous bleeding may be associated with non-curative resection ( P=0.068). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that submucosal involvement (VS confined to the mucosa: β=0.901, P=0.011, OR=2.46, 95% CI: 1.23-4.92), lesion diameter of 3-<5 cm (VS <3 cm: β=0.723, P=0.038, OR=2.06, 95% CI: 1.04-4.09), lesion diameter of ≥5 cm (VS <3 cm: β=2.078, P=0.003, OR=7.99, 95% CI: 2.02-31.66), location in the upper 1/3 of the stomach (VS lower 1/3: β=1.540, P<0.001, OR=4.66, 95% CI: 2.30-9.45), and fold interruption ( β=2.287, P=0.008, OR=1.93, 95% CI: 0.95-3.93) were independent risk factors for non-curative resection of EGC lesions. The factor of lesion diameter of 3-<5 cm and submucosal involvement were assigned 1 point respectively, location in the upper 1/3 of the stomach was assigned 2 points, diameter of ≥5 cm and fold interruption were assigned 3 points respectively, and other factors were assigned 0 point. Then the analysis of 378 lesions showed that the probability of non-curative resection at ≥2 points was 41.9% (37/93), 4 times as much as that at 0 [11.5% (25/217)]. Conclusion:EGC lesions with diameter ≥3 cm, located in the upper 1/3 of the stomach, interrupted folds or submucosal involvement are highly related to non-curative resection. The predictive model based on these factors achieves satisfactory efficacy, but it still needs further validation in larger cohorts.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To assess the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of early esophagogastric junction (EGJ) cancer and precancerous lesion.Methods:Clinical data of 67 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ early EGJ cancer or precancerous lesion who underwent ESD at Endoscopy Center of Peking University First Hospital from July 2012 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical and pathological features, technical data and complication rate were reviewed. The factors that may affect the curative resection were analyzed.Results:Among the 67 cases, 5 were protruding type, 59 flat type, and 3 depressed type. The median lesion diameter was 1.6 ( QR: 1.8) cm, the median operation time was 60.0 ( QR: 56.0) min. The en bloc resection rate was 97.0% (65/67), the complete resection rate was 91.0% (61/67), and the curative resection rate was 82.1% (55/67). Factors related to non-curative resection were tumor size ( OR=8.457, 95% CI: 1.227-58.302, P=0.030) and pathological type ( OR=15.133, 95% CI: 1.518-150.870, P=0.021). ESD-related complications occurred in 3 cases (4.5%), including 1 case of delayed hemorrhage who received endoscopic hemostasis therapy, and 2 cases of post-operative cicatricial stricture who then received endoscopic dilation. Fifty-eight patients were followed up, and recurrence was found in 1 patient during follow-up with positive vertical margin who refused subsequent therapy.Metachronous early gastric cancer was found in another patient during follow-up, who was treated with a second ESD. Conclusion:ESD is a safe, effective and less invasive technique for early EGJ cancer and precancerous lesion. Tumor size, boundary and infiltration depth of the lesion should be accurately evaluated before operation to formulate appropriate treatment strategies.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the safety and long-term efficacy of endoscopic resection of gastric stromal tumors with a diameter of >2-4 cm.Methods:The clinical data of 307 patients, who underwent endoscopic or surgical resection and pathologically confirmed to be gastric stromal tumors with a diameter ≤4 cm in Fujian Provincial Hospital, Jinshan Branch of Fujian Provincial Hospital or Fujian Geriatric Hospital from January 2014 to December 2019, were collected. The propensity score matching (1∶1) was performed for the cases with the tumor size of >2-4 cm.Then the incidence of adverse events related to the operation and clinical outcomes were compared between 41 patients in the endoscopic group and 41 patients in the surgical group.Results:Compared with the surgical group, the median operation time in the endoscopic group was significantly shorter (58.0 min VS 108.0 min, Z=-4.789, P<0.001), and the median hospitalization cost was significantly lower (22.7 thousand yuan VS 42.0 thousand yuan, Z=-7.164, P<0.001). There were no significant differences in postoperative fasting time or postoperative hospitalization time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Complications occurred in 7 cases (17.1%) in the endoscopy group, including 5 cases of postoperative acute infection, 1 case of postoperative perforation, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding; all 9 cases (22.0%) in the surgical group developed postoperative acute infection. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of complications between the two groups ( χ2=0.311, P=0.577). Tumors in both groups were completely removed with negative resection margins. The follow-up time of the endoscopy group was 34.3±15.6 months, and that of the surgical group was 42.2±20.2 months. No recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow-up period in the two groups. Conclusion:Endoscopic resection of large gastric stromal tumor (range>2-4 cm) is safe and effective in the long term, which can be used as one of the methods for gastrointestinal stromal tumors.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To examine the factors related to residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor at the margins after endoscopic resection.Methods:A retrospective case control study was conducted.From January 1, 2013 to March 31, 2018, data on 81 middle-aged and elderly patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumor aged ≥45 years who underwent endoscopic resection at the Endoscopic Center of the First Hospital of Jilin University were retrospectively collected.Based on whether residual tumor existed on histopathological examination, they were divided into the residual group(n=22)and the non-residual group(n=59). The causes of residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor at the margins after endoscopic resection were analyzed.Results:The diameters of lesions in 81 patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors ranged between 0.3-1.5(0.73±0.33)cm.Postoperative histopathological examination revealed that all lesions were G1 neuroendocrine tumors, with residual tumor seen at the margins in 22 cases(27.2%). The mean tumor diameter was(0.78±0.36)cm for the residual group and(0.68±0.28)cm for the non-residual group, with no statistical significance between the two groups( t=1.320, P>0.05). Of the 22 patients in the residual group, 2 cases showed muscularis propria involvement and 14 cases showed tumor infiltration into the submucosa but without lymph node infiltration or metastasis, and in the rest of the cases lesions were confined to the mucosa.None of the 59 patients in the non-residual group had involvement of the muscular layer, but 23 cases showed tumor infiltration into the submucosa(39.0%)and the rest had lesions confined to the mucosa.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant( χ2=11.010, P<0.01). The results of binary Logistic regression analysis suggested that tumor infiltration into or beyond the submucosa( β=1.285, P<0.05)and the absence of preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation( β=-1.147, P<0.05)were independent risk factors for residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor at the margins after endoscopic resection. Conclusions:Tumor infiltration into the submucosa or beyond and lack of preoperative ultrasound evaluation are independent risk factors for residual rectal neuroendocrine tumor at the margins after endoscopic resection.
ABSTRACT
@#Endoscopic resection and surgical resection are the two major therapeutic methods for early esophageal cancer. Endoscopic resection is safe and minimally invasive, but lymph node dissection can not be performed. Although surgery provides a rather thorough resection of the lesions and affected lymph nodes, surgical trauma brings certain negative impact on patients' long-term life quality. A comprehensive assessment of the patient's general condition, the risk of diseased lymph node metastasis, and the risk of the treatment itself is an important measure to optimize treatment decisions and formulate personalized treatment plans.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To analyze the clinicopathological and biological characteristics of esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) and to investigate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic resection for esophageal SMTs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data of 152 cases of esophageal submucosal tumors resected by endoscopy in Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, from February 2013 to June 2018 as well as the pathological properties, distribution characteristics, origin and location of the esophageal SMTs. We also analyzed complications and efficacy of different methods for endoscopic resection. Results: The average age of onset of esophageal SMTs in this group was 52.74±10.53 years, without gender difference. Pathological features were as follows: leiomyoma was more common (73.68%), followed by stromal tumor (11.18%), hemangioma (3.95%), cyst (3.29%), and lipoma (1.97%). SMTs occurred mostly in the middle and lower segments of the esophagus. They were mainly located in the muscularis mucosa (31.58%) and muscularis propria (57.89%), and partly located in the submucosa (10.53%). Endoscopic resection methods consisted of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) performed in 36 cases, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in 52 cases, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) in 63 cases, and full-thickness resection (EFTR) in 1 case. All lesions were completely resected. EMR had small tumor resection and shorter operative time; ESD and STER showed large tumor resection and long operation time (P0.05). Complications were effectively controlled. No local recurrence or residual cases were found in postoperative follow-up. Conclusion: Adult onset of submucosal tumors of the esophagus, without gender difference, can occur in all segments of the esophagus, mostly from the mucosal muscularis and muscularis propria. Leiomyoma is common, followed by stromal tumor, spindle cell tumor, and hemangioma. Endoscopic resection depends on the lesion location, source and size, and endoscopic treatment is safe and effective.
ABSTRACT
With the development of instruments and the innovation of techniques, gastrointestinal endoscopy is expanding the scope and scale in its application. As an important component of endoscopic therapeutic techniques, the development of endoscopic resection techniques is undoubtedly remarkable. The representative techniques including endoscopic submucosal dissection, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery have made endoscopic resectable scope gradually extend from the initial intramucosal to the submucosal, and even extraserosal lesions. This article reviews the state of the art and advances of main endoscopic resection techniques.
ABSTRACT
With the development of instruments and the innovation of techniques, gastrointestinal endoscopy is expanding the scope and scale in its application. As an important component of endoscopic therapeutic techniques, the development of endoscopic resection techniques is undoubtedly remarkable. The representative techniques including endoscopic submucosal dissection, submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery have made endoscopic resectable scope gradually extend from the initial intramucosal to the submucosal, and even extraserosal lesions. This article reviews the state of the art and advances of main endoscopic resection techniques.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To evaluate the short-term outcomes and safety of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) for submucosal tumors (SMT) originating from muscularis propria (MP) layer at esophagogastric junction.@*Methods@#The clinical data of 31 patients with SMT originating from MP layer at esophagogastric junction underwent STER were collected and retrospectively analyzed.@*Results@#The success rate of STER of the thirty-one patients was 100%. The mean tumor size was (2.5±1.3) cm and the average operative time was (95.9±56.7) min. Perforation occurred in 3 patients and was successfully clipped by endo-clips during operation. One patient developed delayed bleeding and the bleeding was stopped by endoscopic hemostasis. Twenty-nine leiomyomas and two stromal tumors (GIST) were finally pathologically diagnosed. No local recurrence and distant metastasis were noted during the mean 15.4 months follow-up of 20 cases. According to the lesion size, 31 patients who received STER were divided into two groups. The operation time of maximum diameter ≥3.5 cm group was (134.0±70.6) min, significantly longer than (80.3±42.6) min of maximum diameter <3.5 cm group (P=0.014). However, the en bloc removal rate, postoperative hospital stay and the complication incidence between the two groups had no obvious differences (P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the piecemeal removal group had longer tumor diameter, higher incidence of irregular tumor morphology, and longer operative time than the en bloc removal group (all P<0.05). Stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that irregular shape was a risk factor for failure of en bloc removal (OR=18.000, 95% CI: 1.885~171.88, P=0.012).@*Conclusion@#As a new method of minimally invasive treatment, STER technology appears to be a safe and effective option for patients with SMT originating from MP layer at esophagogastric junction.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic remedial surgery in patients who didn′t reach the cure criterion of early colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection.@*Methods@#The clinical and follow-up data of 12 patients who didn′t reach the cure criterion of early colorectal cancer and then underwent endoscopic resection was collected. The clinicalpathological features and remedial indications were analyzed to evaluate the effects of laparoscopic remedial surgery.@*Results@#The average number of lymph nodes in the lymph node dissection was 15 during remedial surgery, and 3 of them had lymph node metastasis. Among the 3 patients with residual cancer, two cases were poorly differentiated, 1 case was moderately differentiated, 1 case was positive for basal margin, and 1 case had vascular invasion. No lymph node metastasis occurred in the 9 patients who had no residual cancer. Among these, 8 cases were moderately differentiated, 1 case was poorly differentiated and 2 cases had positive basal margin. The average follow-up duration was 40 months and all 12 patients were in a state of survival at the last follow-up. During the follow-up of the 3 patients with residual cancer, 1 patient received adjuvant chemotherapy with unknown prognosis; 1 patient received postoperative adjuvant radiochemotherapy, and lung metastasis occurred; 1 patient did not receive any treatment after surgery and survived for 33 months.@*Conclusions@#Laparoscopic remedial surgery is a safe and feasible remedy for patients who didn′t reach the cure criterion of early colorectal cancer after endoscopic resection. However, the choice of remedial strategy for colorectal carcinoma needs further investigation for patients with no vascular invasion, high degree of differentiation, and negative basal margin.
ABSTRACT
Both endoscopic resection and surgery are the common treatment modes for early esophageal cancer. Compared with radical surgery, endoscopic resection has the advantages of less trauma, quicker recovery, lower cost, less complications, the preservation of the normal anatomy, the physiological function of the esophagus, and higher postoperative quality of life. For patients with a high risk of lymph node metastasis, endoscopic resection alone can lead to inadequate treatment, which need adjuvant therapies. Currently, the common adjuvant therapies consist of adjuvant radiochemotherapy and adjuvant radiochemotherapy combined with surgery. How to combine endoscopic resection with adjuvant therapy to bring maximal benefits to patients has become the hot topic in the field of clinical researches. In this article, the current research status, progress and challenges in the combination of endoscopic resection and adjuvant therapy for the treatment of high-risk patients were reviewed.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To analyze the risk factors of cancer recurrence in stomach after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC).@*Methods@#Data of 59 patients with early gastric cancer, who underwent non-curative resection at endoscopy center of Shanghai Renji Hospital from October 2008 to June 2018, were analyzed with the univariate Logistic regression for the risk factors of cancer recurrence in the stomach.@*Results@#The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 77 months, with the median time of 40 months. There were 11 cases of cancer recurrence in the stomach. The univariate Logistic regression analysis showed lymphatic vessel invasion (OR=8.63, 95%CI: 1.24-60.04, P=0.030) and eCura high-risk grading (OR=7.31, 95%CI: 1.05-51.10, P=0.045) were risk factors for cancer recurrence in the stomach.@*Conclusion@#The routine eCura grading assessment can be considered after non-cure resection. Patients with lymphatic vessel invasion or high-risk eCura category are not recommended for follow-up; patients with low-risk eCura grading can be followed up by regular endoscopy and attention should be paid to whether there are abnormalities around the original lesion.
ABSTRACT
Objective To analyze the risk factors of cancer recurrence in stomach after non-curative endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods Data of 59 patients with early gastric cancer, who underwent non-curative resection at endoscopy center of Shanghai Renji Hospital from October 2008 to June 2018, were analyzed with the univariate Logistic regression for the risk factors of cancer recurrence in the stomach. Results The follow-up period ranged from 4 to 77 months, with the median time of 40 months. There were 11 cases of cancer recurrence in the stomach. The univariate Logistic regression analysis showed lymphatic vessel invasion ( OR=8. 63, 95％CI:1. 24-60. 04, P=0. 030) and eCura high-risk grading (OR=7. 31,95％CI:1. 05-51. 10, P=0. 045) were risk factors for cancer recurrence in the stomach. Conclusion The routine eCura grading assessment can be considered after non-cure resection. Patients with lymphatic vessel invasion or high-risk eCura category are not recommended for follow-up;patients with low-risk eCura grading can be followed up by regular endoscopy and attention should be paid to whether there are abnormalities around the original lesion.